Sunday, April 19, 2015

Cultural Events

New York City Baby
                I went to New York for the first time last year through Shepherd.  They did a day trip up to the city where they packed everyone on a bus at 4AM and we didn’t get back till the same time the next day.  It was one of the most exciting and tiring experiences of my life.  The whole time I was there, I kept asking myself why I had never done this before.  I realized I’m still in this mindset that I need adult supervision to do something cool.   Even when I went to New York I did so with the safety net of going with the school.  Well I swore to myself that I was going to be a big boy and do something on my own, so my friends and I planned a weekend trip to NYC for the beginning of this semester.
                The biggest concern we had about going to New York was expense and parking.  Luckily we found a way to combat both.  Instead of staying in a hotel, we stayed in a hostel on 101st and Broadway.  It was the nicest hostel I’ve ever been in.  As for parking, we parked at the Staten Island ferry for $20 and road the ferry in.
                The whole experience was awesome.  First, the TV in our room only picked up Chinese channels.  I spent most of the first night watching a Chinese rip off of America’s Got Talent.  It was the most mesmerizing entertainment I’ve ever witnessed.  Also, when you search Yelp for best
restaurants in Manhattan, the top 10 on the list are all five star restaurants, except for one.  Number 3 was a place called prosperity dumpling in China Town that gives you four fresh dumplings for a dollar.  Of course I had to go there.  It was awesome in every way.  First off, I got to experience China Town, which is an experience.  Then you stumble into this tiny shop with a small angry gentlemen who asks you what you want.  You tell him, hand him a dollar, and he makes it in front of you.  While in line, I was standing between an elderly Chinese woman and some Yuppie Wall Street broker in a $3,000 suit.  It was a true melting pot.
150 dead women
                I got to visit a lot of cool places, but there were two that I was really excited about.  The
first was the Triangle Fire Building right by Washington Square Park.  If you don’t know the storied history of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire, I’ll indulge you.  Basically women were locked in the top floor of this factory and forced to work all day without breaks.  One day, a fire breaks out.  The women are locked in the building and 150 die either from fire or leaping from the windows.  It was one of the most important moments in the call for unions in the US.  The building today is I believe a chemistry lab for NYU.  There is a tiny plaque 10 feet in the air on one of the corners of the building.
                The second place I really enjoyed was the Museum of Natural History.  It was the only museum I was able to go to the few days I was in New York, simply because the last hour it’s open they don’t charge admission.  I was only able to spend about 45 minutes walking around, but it was really nice, a lot better than the one in DC.  I not only got see some groovy artifacts, but I got to visit one of the settings of a Ben Stiller comedy.

Inherent Vice
                About two years ago, Paul Thomas Anderson’s The Master came out.  It’s a dense film kind of about Scientology but mostly about two men struggling to find their place.  As a fan of P.T., I followed the film very closely, but was unable to see it until it came out on VOD.  The first time I watched it, I was blown away, but not necessarily in a good way.  I knew what I’d see was great, but I wasn’t sure I understood it.  As I’ve watched it, I have come to understand why I was blown away, and I now consider it one of my favorite films.
                Anderson did some pretty extensive publicity for the movie considering it was a pretty Inherent Vice, I went out and bought the first Pynchon book I could find which just so happened to be his first book V.  Reading V was one of the most interesting experiences I’d ever had.  I enjoyed it the whole way through, but I wouldn’t say I “got” it till I was close to the end.
small film.  One particular event he did was an hour long Q&A about the film.  It was recorded and posted on Youtube.  Watching this video was the first time I’d ever heard of Thomas Pynchon.  When it was announced that Anderson’s next film was going to be an adaptation of a Pynchon’s novel
                After reading V I was incredibly excited to seen Anderson’s interpretation of Inherent Vice.  I even bought the book but decided to wait until I’d seen the movie to read it.  I followed the films production and early screenings as much as I could, while trying to learn as little about the film as possible.  When it came out, it did not show at The Alamo in Winchester, which is the best theater I’ve ever been to.  I like it so much I almost exclusively go there.  My original intention was to wait until the Vice came to the Alamo in hopes that they would play it in 70mm, but after nearly two years of waiting I couldn’t control myself.
                I broke down and went with my friend to see it at the Regal in Fredrick.  I would like to go on record as saying that Regal theaters are the devil.  No, worse than the devil.  If I had to choose between going to a Turkish bath with Satan and attending a screening of my favorite movie in a Regal theater while being showered with money, I’d chill with Satan.
                Even though Regal BLOWS, I still enjoyed the movie.  Like the Master, I knew what I’d
seen was good, but I wasn’t sure why yet.  I saw it again a week later, and after mulling it over, I thoroughly enjoyed it.  Anderson did what many people thought was impossible.  He adapted a Pynchon novel.  Because it’s an adaptation of a Pynchon book, it’s a bit of a tough watch.  Pynchon uses subtle word play to cover up the absurdity of what he’s talking about.  A lot of time, I’ll find myself having to reread a passage before I get what he’s trying to say.  This type of dense writing is accepted in the literary community, but not so much in the film community.  People want the movie to make sense the first time around, which would have meant compromising the integrity of the Pynchon novel.
                I could go on for hours, so I’m going to stop myself.  Simply put, I was more excited for Inherent Vice than I was for any movie in my life, and I was not let down.  I plan on being the first person in line to buy the DVD when it comes out.

Deaf Basketball
                One of my friends it taking a sign language class, and occasionally the class will go to deaf events in order to practice their skills.  I tagged along on one of these trips because I had nothing better to do, and it would meet this requirement for class.
                I grew up in Hampshire County, West Virginia which is home to I believe the only deaf school in the state.  If not the state, then at least the panhandle.  I had a lot of interaction with deaf students during my time there.  The school for the deaf and blind is constantly having its budget cut, so it became cheaper to have some students attend classes at my high school.  I had classes with blind
and deaf students who would have a helper with them. 
                Before going to this game, I had never seen a deaf basketball game, but I had seen a deaf volleyball game at my school.  For the most part, it was similar.  Coaches were reliant on hand signals to call plays as well as drums that send vibrations through the floor.
                The strange thing about the whole event is that you would expect a deaf event to be quiet.  For instance you wouldn’t expect them to have announcers or play music over speakers, but they did.  For the most part, it seemed like the audience themselves weren’t deaf.  Many people knew sign language, but many people were able to speak as well.  Several players on the team had hearing aids, so I guess and the deaf teams weren’t all that deaf.
                Ultimately it wasn’t any kind of shocking or profound experience for me.  The only thing I was worried about was ordering something at the snack stand.  I made my friend come with me so she could sign to the concessions lady, but she ended up being able to hear.
  

The Strangled Darlings
The Strangled Darlings are probably one of the strangest bands I’ve ever seen.  It’s made up of two members George Veech and Jess Anderly.  George plays the mandolin and Jess plays a custom made electric cello that functions more as a bass guitar.
Electronic Cello
They classify their music as a cross between Americana Doom Pop and Indie Folk which is probably the best explanation of their music that can be given.  I saw them perform in Winchester at the Bright Box Theater.  A local girl from Harper’s Ferry opened up for them singing self-written country ballads and playing a barely filtered electric guitar.  What appeared to be a mute giant played a small
drum kit behind her.
When The Strangled Darlings took the stage, the first question I asked myself was, “Is that it?”  Seeing a man with a mandolin and a woman with some alien stringed instrument take the stage made me incredibly skeptical, but as soon as they started to play, that skepticism was washed away.  As I’ve said, it’s hard to describe their sound, so all I’ll say is it works.
Watching the two of them perform was mesmerizing, though there was little showmanship.  George moved around the stage in a way that was reminiscent of Talking Heads front man David Byrne.  Jess stood stoically as you’d expect as bass player to do, but I couldn’t stop watching as she plucked at her instrument.  In between songs, the two exchanged comedic non-sequiturs and talked about their experiences traveling the country in a Winnebago.
It was one of those “You had to be there,” experiences because, well, you had to be there.  IF you want a taste, check out this sweet vid

English Capstone Presentation
                As a disclaimer, I had intended to attend a lecture by Dr. Foulds about women in the Confederacy, but I spaced out and went to a Five Guys instead.  I realized about halfway through my burger that I was missing the lecture, which really bummed me out because Dr. Foulds is a great professor and it was going to be my last chance to see him lecture.  Luckily I was able to eat my sorrows away immediately.
                I attended the English Capstone presentations that were held in Reynolds hall.  I believe there were about eight presentations, but I had to leave after the fifth one to go to work.  I actually really enjoyed the presentations that I saw.  For some reason I went in thinking that it was going to be incredibly boring, but I had a swingin’ time. 
                I had a few friends that were presenting.  One presented some poetry she had written and the other presented a story they had adapted from a screenplay they wrote.  I had already talked to them about their projects, so I knew what to expect.  The other projects caught me pleasantly off guard.
                The one that I enjoyed the most was a guy who had written several Haikus for his capstone.  He first started by giving the history of the original Japanese art of Haiku and how it was adapted into English.  He spoke about how he had originally chosen to do haiku because it just seemed easy, but he quickly realized that because it’s such an abbreviated form, you have to pay extreme attention to what words you use.  You need to be able to convey a vivid thought with the least amount of words possible.

                I appreciate this simplicity in writing.  Whenever I write anything, it always comes out longwinded.  I greatly respect people who are able to write purely and simply because the amount of work it takes to reduce something to its most basic form without compromising any of the emotion it evokes is a profoundly difficult task.

Capstone Presentation

Me
As a whole, my capstone experience was pretty stressful.  I put a lot of work into a project that ultimately didn't pan out, and I had to scramble at the last minute to pull something together.  On top of that, I've had to handle a stressful course load and a job. I'm still working on my capstone!  I have another presentation I have to give on Monday that needs to be 20 minutes long.  Luckily my film runs about 10 minutes, so I have half of it prepared.

It's pretty hard to give some kind of reflection at this point since I'm still in the mindset that I'm not finished yet.  I've also been working on  it for so long that it hasn't fully set in that I'm finished.  Once I'm able to take a step back and breathe for a minute, I hope I'll have something profound to say. Unfortunately I've never had anything profound to say, so I'm holding myself to an unrealistic standard.

Working on my portfolio has had more of an effect on me than finishing my capstone.  I've had to go and look back at everything I've done since I started here at Shepherd University.  Most of it makes me sick, but there are a few glimmers of light.  Sorry I'm not insightful right now, but I still have so much work to do I can't think.  All I can think about it this paper on propaganda in Tudor England that's due Wednesday, and I'm sure you want to read about that even less than I do.

Sunday, April 5, 2015

What's Going On

   Presentations are a week away and I'm scrambling to pull everything together.  As of now, I have about 1 more page of my script to shoot.  In the meantime, I've been editing all of my other footage.  I've arranged it all and I'm working on color correction right now.  I'm confident I will be finished by the time our presentations are due, but it's going to be a close finish.
Poster So Far

   I've also been working on my poster for my board.  I'm pretty happy with how it's coming together.  I always have these very vivid images in my head, but I'm almost never able to pull them into reality.  This is one of the times where I've been able to get something pretty close to what I saw in my minds eye.  I'm still waiting on some feedback, and looking at it now I already see a few things that need changing, but I'm pretty happy with how it's turned out!

   I don't really have much else to say right now.  For once, everything is coming together with lighting speed and I'm afraid of jinxing it.

Monday, March 30, 2015

Faculty Review

I've spent over three months rigorously preparing my capstone, not including the months of research, and I have nothing to show for it.  It's truly the great American heartbreak.  My task during my review session was to convince the Mass Communication faculty that I've actually been doing something, and I think I achieved that.

Metaphor
The important thing for me was to present my oh so disappointing capstone situation, but not to dwell on it.  Whenever I have a sob story to tell, especially to a room full of college professors, I try to keep it as brief as possible because people have heard it all before.  I wanted to lay out my situation, but instead of wallowing in self pity, (which I'm still doing in private) I wanted to lay out my plan to fix the issues I've been faced with.  Even though Dr. Kushin looked both scared and confused, I feel like I did a pretty good job.

Dr. Williams specifically said that he liked the idea of taking my screenplay and cutting it to a more manageable size instead of shooting a trailer.  That was really the reassurance I was looking for.  After putting months of work into this monstrosity, I wanted to have something shot.  I was worried that shooting something that's more of a spiritual predecessor to my original script than a shortened version of it would make my project too scattered, so receiving clear support of that idea was really helpful.

I'm actually nearly halfway through shooting my project right now.  I took the weekend and shot about five pages of my script.  Tomorrow I'm shooting one page, Wednesday I'm shooting 2 pages, and next Monday, I'm shooting the last three pages.  Once I finish with this blog, I'm going to edit the footage I shot this weekend.  This puts me on track to finish my film just in time for presentations. Yipee!


Friday, March 20, 2015

The Master: A Narrative Analysis

The Master:
 A Narrative Analysis

Man is not an animal. We are not a part of the animal kingdom. We sit far above that crown, perched as spirits, not beasts. 
-Lancaster Dodd

A Synopsis

                Paul Thomas Anderson’s The Master is a film that is much more than the sum of its parts.  At its most basic level, it is the story of Freddie Quell and his bungling attempts to adapt to life post-WWII.  His impulsive, animalistic behavior causes him to be run out of any town where he lays his head, until he meets the mysterious Lancaster Dodd, leader of a movement called “The Cause.”

Freddie
Lancaster
                Dodd defines himself as “a writer, a doctor, a nuclear physicist, a theoretical philosopher, but, above all, [a man]. A hopelessly inquisitive man…”  Dodd accepts Freddie into his family and attempts to assimilate him
into his movement.

                The Master is as complex as the larger-than-life Dodd.  It draws on the life of the enigmatic L. Ron Hubbard, and films such as John Huston’s documentary Let There Be Light which examines the psyche of post-war soldiers.  The motivations of the characters and much of the defining action of the film is implicit, adding even deeper layers of complexity.  It’s a film that could ostensibly be about everything or nothing.  It is a drama, a love story, an exposé of Scientology, an anti-war parable, a study of the power of sexuality, an examination of the birth and growth of both cult and spiritual movements, and anything else you can think of.

                This narrative analysis will examine only the expositional elements of the film.  Only the explicit actions and their potential motivations will be explored simply because the implications of these actions were made purposefully vague by the filmmaker.  It would be impossible to examine a singular interpretation of the film without spending a great deal of time on other possible interpretations.

                                                                             A Map:
                                                                     Actantial Model






A Key

1.       Subject: The driving character of the story.

a.       Freddie Quell: 
Freddie is the subject of The Master.  He is given a quest which he sets out to achieve, and he has a series of helpers and opponents that interact with him on his quest.  Freddie also exemplifies the Jungian hero archetype.  
The journey of the hero according to Jung can be divided into three sections: 

Information from http://www.cgjungny.org/d/d_mythpsyche.html 

    Freddie begins the film in a state of preconsciousness and is purely a reactionary animal.  While on a naval tour of what appears to be the Pacific theater of WWII, Freddie is shown drinking alcohol made from the ethanol of torpedoes, simulating sex with a sandcastle, and masturbating in public. 

                Freddie’s ego is awakened once he is discharged from the Navy at the end of the war.  He is immediately put into a hospital for returning soldiers and treated for post-traumatic stress disorder.  The realization of the ego, or self, creates the main
Freddie in the Hospital
struggle of Freddie’s story.  He craves acceptance in society and attempts to achieve this through work and relationships with women as stable employment and marriage are societal expectations of men.  Unfortunately, the animal of his preconscious is still a major factor in his life.  Freddie’s heroic struggle is attempting to quell his animalistic impulses in order to adapt to society.  

                Wholeness, or at least some semblance of wholeness, is achieved after Freddie breaks from Lancaster and The Cause.  He is able to take what he learned from his experience with Lancaster and use it to adapt to society.  Wholeness for Freddie is being able to hold down a job and have a reasonably normal interaction with a woman, and he is ultimately able to achieve these.           
                                    Freddie Attempts to Hold Down a Job

   As a disclaimer, some have argued that the subject of The Master is actually Lancaster Dodd.  The actant model graphed above could easily be filled out with Dodd as the subject as could the Jungian model of the hero.  As mentioned in the synopsis, The Master is incredibly complex and often vague.  An argument could certainly be made for dual subjects, both Freddie and Lancaster, but Freddie is the driving force of the story.  It is only through Freddie’s association with The Cause that we learn of Lancaster and his goals.  Once Freddie splits from The Cause, the viewer is no longer privy to Lancaster.

2.       Object: The quest or goal given to the subject.

a.       Societal Acceptance:
Freddie makes a drink from cleaning supplies
Freddie’s goal is to find a place in a world he doesn’t understand.  It may not be a goal that he consciously wants, but if he doesn’t conform to society he will die.  This is shown in the intermediary period between his dismissal from the Navy and his meeting Lancaster.  During that brief time he assaults a customer in a store, sexually assaults a woman, and accidentally poisons a man with one of his alcoholic concoctions.

3.       Addresser: The one who assigns the object to the subject. (1)

a.       World War II:
Little information is given about Freddie’s life before the war.  It appears that he was relatively adjusted or at least that his strange behavior was attributed to him being young.  His eccentric behavior is magnified by his experience during the war.  While he is in the hospital, it is revealed that he was prone to hallucinations and fits of
Freddie During The War
nostalgia.  The fact that these symptoms do not manifest during his time after the war implies that his experience during the war was incredibly stressful.

No matter what specifically happened to him during the war, it caused him to become unbalanced.  His animalistic behavior created by the stress of war conflicts with the expectations of society.


4.       Addresse: Who receives the object.(1) 

a.       Freddie:
When Freddie achieves balance and wholeness, he becomes an accepted member of society.  His life has the potential to achieve some level of fulfillment, and he is also allowed to live because he has become adjusted.

b.      Society:
When Freddie was running untethered through the streets, society was in danger of falling apart.  Freddie’s impulsive behavior brought out the impulsive behaviors of others.  People would react violently to his actions, and he would often fuel chaos by providing people with alcohol.  Freddie was imbalanced within himself, but he was also causing an imbalance within society.  When he achieves wholeness, society becomes balanced once again, thus avoiding a potential breakdown.

5.       Helper: Entities that assist the subject in achieving their goal.

a.       The Cause
Though The Cause in not necessarily a sympathetic movement, arguably becoming a cult by the end of the film, it is a necessary part of Freddie’s journey.  The Cause gives Freddie a clear set of rules and boundaries as well as a support group.  By becoming a member of The Cause, Freddie must become conform to society’s expectations, effectively completing his quest.

                                                              i.      Lancaster:
Lancaster is Freddie’s means of access to the cause.  Lancaster becomes Freddie’s friend and mentor.  He treats Freddie with a loving strictness, and is willing to put in the necessary effort to bring about change.

                                                            ii.      Peggy:
Lancaster’s wife Peggy may in fact be The Cause’s most loyal follower.  She keeps Lancaster’s own impulses in check, keeping him focused on “curing” Freddie as well as the goals of The Cause.

6.       Enemy: Entities that hinder the subject’s quest.

a.       Freddie:
The biggest enemy that Freddie faces is himself.  His preoccupation with sex and alcohol often lead to violent outbursts.  All of Freddie’s helpers are attempting to help Freddie control himself. 

b.      Lancaster:
Lancaster is both beneficial and detrimental to Freddie’s quest.  He genuinely wants to help Freddie become a functioning member of society, but he is not doing it in Freddie’s best interest.  Lancaster’s argument, and the basis of the cause, is that man is not animal, man is a higher being.  By taking someone who is more animal than man and being able to elevate him above the bestial world, he is giving legitimacy to the basis of his movement.

Lancaster is not the epitome of the evolved man that he would have his followers to believe.  Arguably, his entire movement is his attempt to deal with his homosexuality.  It becomes apparent as the film progresses that his fascination with Freddie may be more romantic than charitable.  While publicly Lancaster encourages Freddie to control his urges, in private, Lancaster encourages him to continue consuming alcohol.  He also encourages Freddie to attack outspoken dissenters of The Cause. 
                                                          Lancaster Singing to Freddie

Freddie becomes Lancaster’s mad guard dog, and his means to partake in many of the bestial impulses that he condemns. Freddie’s final task in order to complete his quest is to break from Lancaster’s grasp.

c.       The Cause:
As with Lancaster, The Cause is crucial in Freddie’s rehabilitation, but it does so for its own gain, not out of kindness towards Freddie.

d.      John More:
John More is a skeptic that confronts Lancaster at one of the Cause’s gatherings.  Lancaster becomes enraged when John questions his claims that The Cause’s methods can cure disease and unlock the memories of past lives.  Though John is in the right, he is not in the right in terms of Freddie’s journey.  The doubt that he casts causes Freddie to react violently.  He beats John near to death in his hotel room later that night.

Not only do John More’s accusations cause Freddie to regress, if he had been successful in convincing Freddie of The Cause’s shortcomings, Freddie would not have been able to achieve his goal.  Ostensibly, the only person that could have “cured” Freddie was Lancaster.  If John has been able to show Freddie the truth about The Cause, Freddie would never have been able to adapt to society.
                                                        John More Confronts Lancaster

e.      Val:
Val is Lancaster’s son who is not a true believer in The Cause.  At one point he tells Freddie that Lancaster is "making the whole thing up".  Much like John More, Val attempts to reveal the truth to Freddie about The Cause.  If he had succeeded, Freddie would have never achieved his goal.
                                                             Freddie's Violent Doubt

7.       Axes:
a.       Axis of Desire:

The axis of desire is the relationship between the subject and the object. (2)
In The Master, the object that the subject (Freddie) desires and requires to complete his quest is acceptance into society.

b.      Axis of Power:

The axis of power is the relationship of the helpers and enemies to the subject and his quest. (2) In The Master, the helpers push Freddie toward his goal, while his enemies attempt to use him for their own means.

c.       Axis of Transmission:
                  The axis of transmission is the relationship between the addresser and addressee.  The addresser wishes to deliver the object to the addressee, enlisting the subject to do so.

                   In The Master, this axis is a little more complex than usual since the addresser is an event as opposed to a specific entity.  The war puts Freddie on a quest to achieve balance and acceptance in society.  In doing so, both society and Freddie achieve wholeness.


Propp’s Narrative Analysis (3)

                Most if not all stories can be broken down into a basic six part analysis consisting of the preparation, the complication, transference, the struggle, the return, and the recognition.  The problem with this model in the case of The Master is that it relies on an explicit dichotomy between hero and villain.  This does not exist in The Master.

                The hero of the story is most definitely Freddie Quell, but the villain is not as obvious.  In the actantial model above, a list of Freddie’s enemies was set forth.  Ironically, most of the proposed enemies were also his helpers.  In order to discern the villain, the object must be examined.

                Freddie’s goal is to find a place in society which requires him to adapt to it.  The person that consistently interferes with this goal is Freddie himself.  Though Lancaster and The Cause use Freddie for their own means, they are crucial components in Freddie’s quest.  Since the main conflict in this film is Freddie vs. Freddie or man vs. himself, many of the tropes examined in a structural narrative analysis either do not apply or apply in a secondhand manner.

                This application of Vladimir Propp’s narrative structure will examine only the aspects that can be explicitly applied to The Master.

1.       The Preparation

a.       A prohibition or rule is imposed on the hero.
                                                   i.      The rules of society are imposed on Freddie

b.      The prohibition or rule is broken.
                                                   i.      Freddie consistently breaks societies established rules and norms

c.       The villain seeks to deceive the victim.
                                                   i.      Freddie convinces himself that he can live without conforming to society’s rules by simply running away from consequences.
Freddie Running Away

2.       Complication

a.       The villain harms a member of the family.
                                                   i.      Freddie’s actions cause him to be punished.

b.      A member of the family lacks or desires something.
                                                   i.      Freddie craves acceptance.

c.       The hero plans action against the villain.
                                                   i.      Freddie decides to fight against his animalistic instincts.

3.       Transference

a.       The hero is tested, attacked, or interrogated.
                                                   i.      Freddie meets Lancaster and is subjected to “Processing.”  His initiation into The Cause forces him to face himself.
                                                                       Freddie Confronts Himself

b.      The Hero receives a helper.
                                                   i.      Freddie meets Lancaster who makes it his business to help Freddie.

c.       The hero is transferred to the location of the object.
                                                   i.      Lancaster takes Freddie far away making it possible for him to avoid the consequences of his previous actions and focus on his quest.

4.       Struggle

a.       The hero and villain join in combat.
                                                   i.      Through a series of tasks, Freddie learns to control himself.

b.      The villain is defeated.
                                                   i.      Freddie is able to become a functioning member of The Cause and society.

c.       The initial lack is set right.
                                                   i.      Freddie is able to adapt to society’s expectations.

5.       Return

a.       The hero returns.
                                                   i.      Freddie returns to his hometown, to a girl he loved before the war.

b.      The hero is pursued.
                                                   i.      Lancaster contacts Freddie and tells him to come to England.

c.       A difficult task is set for the hero.
                                                   i.      Freddie must decide whether to commit to The Cause or reject it.

d.      The task is accomplished.
                                                   i.      Freddie rejects The Cause.

e.      The hero arrives somewhere and is not recognized.
                                                   i.      Freddie travels to England where he is unknown.

6.       Recognition

a.       The hero is married and crowned.
                                                   i.      Freddie has a normal interaction with a woman.  In their last meeting, Lancaster says to Freddie, “If you figure a way to live without serving a master, any master, then let the rest of us know, will you? For you'd be the first person in the history of the world.”  Freddie is able to become the master of himself, effectively controlling his impulses.

Conclusion

As stated at the beginning, this is an incredibly complex piece of cinema.  It is purposefully enigmatic making it difficult yet exciting to interpret.  The main purpose of The Master is to answer the question posed by its title.  Who is the Master?  Each character has something that controls them, whether it be a goal, a belief, another person, or an uncontrollable force, and each character is attempting to become the master of their own life. For Freddie, the master of his life is his bestial nature.  He sets out on a quest to control this side of him so that he can be accepted into society. 

He is given the tools to control his impulses by Lancaster Dodd and his cause.  At the beginning of the film, Lancaster defines Freddie as a “hopelessly inquisitive man,” just like himself.  At the end of the film, Lancaster is still on his journey for answers. Whether or not Freddie is able to completely assimilate into society is unknown, but either way Freddie has come to accept himself.  He may never achieve his goal, but he has found what the others lack.  Contentment.